research study with Cyton stream + Stimulus marker + Button response
We're planning to use OpenBCI hardware (Cyton + Daisy) to run a visual perception study and we have some doubts about which would be the best approach to synchronize EEG stream data (ideally 16 channels) + EEG markers (stimuli + button responses). Our goal is to present visual stimuli to participants in a go/no-go task (e.g., green/red lights) using external software (e.g., PsychoPy, Psychtoolbox, or EEG-ExPy) and record the participants' responses. For that, we need to mark the EEG stream with the stimulus onset and with the button response.
So far, I have read different entries on this forum from the past years and I have come up with two different potential ways of pursuing the study that I would rather double-check with you (so, here we go!):
(1) ANALOG APPROACH: Use the OpenBCI GUI to record the EEG data + an external button attached to the analog input of the Cyton board + a photosensor attached to the screen to detect the stimulus changes and also plugged to the analog input of the board (as shown in this example and here). This option will save directly the data from the OpenBCI GUI in our preferred (.txt) format. Easy peasy.
(2) DIGITAL APPROACH: Use EEG-ExPy for on-screen stimuli presentation + BrainFlow Python + LSL to be able to use two different markers (stimulus + response) + LabRecorder to connect to both streams (they will be synchronized and merged into one XDF file). Here, I would need to do more research on whether EEG-ExPy/Psytoolbox allows for the recollection of responses (e.g., via keyboard) and it can all be done in digital mode, or whether we need the external button for it. Also, in the use of BrainFlow Pyton and/or LSL.
- Regarding the response time accuracy: Is it correct that the external trigger approach (1) more accurate (vs digital) since the trigger data recorded in the Cyton 'Aux' channels is sampled at the same time as the channel data (i.e., 250 Hz in the case of Cyton 8 channel alone or 125 Hz in the case of Cyton + Daisy)?
- Restrictions of channels (Cyton + Daisy): In the analog approach (1) can we use Cyton + Daisy or we can only use the Cyton because we are using the analog mode? In the digital approach (2), do we have this channel restriction?
- Best approach for computer/s use: Would it be ideal to use one computer for stimulus presentation and another for EEG recording? Or that would depend on the approach we decide to use?
- Digital approach (2): BrainFlow Python + LSL + LabRecorder is better recommended than OpenBCI GUI Networking + LSL widget, right (see previous forum entry)?
Is there a third approach more suitable for our needs that we are not considering?
What do you think the best approach would be in our case?
Thank you beforehand and keep rocking & rolling with OpenBCI!